2003 - 2006 Silverado SS's ... |
|
2003 - 2006 Silverado SS's ... |
Feb 23 2017, 12:14 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 592 Joined: 16-October 06 From: Logan, UT Member No.: 1,416 |
So in looking at replacement trucks for my '98 rcsb ... I do get a little excited about the SS Silverado's
Specifically 6.0 liters, and AWD (winter "capable" needed here in UT) Has anyone owned one or have any experiences ? I heard they don't get to good of mileage, but that's not too huge of a concern, as I don't put too many miles on my truck. Any input appreciated (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) (IMG:http://x-img.autorevo.com/2005-chevrolet-silverado-ss-indio-ca-6090201/1619797-1-bigger.jpg) ~DaVe |
|
|
Feb 23 2017, 07:56 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 663 Joined: 30-January 15 From: Columbus, OH Member No.: 223,855 |
Now I'm wondering if dialing back TQ management actually raises gas mileage. It would probably help the city more than the highway if so.
|
|
|
Feb 23 2017, 08:46 PM
Post
#3
|
|
FRRAX Owner/Admin Group: Admin Posts: 15,428 Joined: 13-February 04 From: Ohio Member No.: 196 |
Now I'm wondering if dialing back TQ management actually raises gas mileage. It would probably help the city more than the highway if so. Many of the torque management systems pull timing (as I understand it). If you're pulling timing to artificially limit power, you're likely wasting fuel mileage. I don't know if they have any tricks to offset that, but usually running an engine with the timing retarded doesn't do anything good for efficiency. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 2nd October 2024 - 01:38 PM |