 New Pontiac Solstace pics, Chassis, suspension, interior, etc. |
|
|||||||||
  |
 Jan 14 2004, 02:07 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
F-bodyless....  Group: Advanced Members Posts: 243 Joined: 31-December 03 From: Austin, TX Member No.: 77  |
Looks like competition for a z4. The air intake looks almost like an afterthought, but the rest of the car looks good. I was also under the impression that it was going to be blown, but that was the story back when it still was in early showcar stage. Not sure what the new specs are going to be on that motor.
|
 |
 
|
|
Jan 14 2004, 02:14 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 410 Joined: 24-December 03 From: Kissimmee/Orlando, FL Member No.: 25 |
Whoops, forgot the spec sheet:
http://www.sub300.com/gm/solspecs.gif The motor is a 2.4L Ecotec with 170hp/170tq, but seeing as we're at least a year away from it being released that could change. Or this could just be the base engine and the supercharged one will be an option. 170hp isn't bad though... |
|
|
|
|
Jan 14 2004, 02:50 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 440 Joined: 25-December 03 From: Newport Beach, California Member No.: 41 |
i like it.. the front end is kinda ugly though
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 15 2004, 06:55 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 69 Joined: 24-December 03 From: Fayetteville, GA Member No.: 31 |
supposed to have under 20k nonblown version, plus a higher end blown version.
also, probably not gonna have a coupe, the saturn curve will be the Coupe, unless demand warrants the solstice. and they most likely wont build the bel air nomad or whatever it was in those pics. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 18 2004, 05:04 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 136 Joined: 23-December 03 Member No.: 18 |
I like the looks of it, and it sounds reasonably priced.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 20 2004, 03:31 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 123 Joined: 25-December 03 From: KS Member No.: 38 |
What are the two protrusions in this image?
http://www.gminsidenews.com/images/rev30.jpg They could have made the front of the car look a bit more exciting than the prototype. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 20 2004, 03:40 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 5,226 Joined: 24-December 03 From: Danville, CA, USA Member No.: 27 |
QUOTE I believe them to be the bolt/mounts of the diff to the crossmember in the pic. With two halfshafts going in either direction. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 20 2004, 03:47 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 123 Joined: 25-December 03 From: KS Member No.: 38 |
QUOTE (rmackintosh @ Jan 19 2004, 10:40 PM) I believe them to be the bolt/mounts of the diff to the crossmember in the pic. With two halfshafts going in either direction. You are correct. I did not see the welds, and I do now. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 21 2004, 05:38 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 439 Joined: 14-January 04 From: Texas Member No.: 128 |
Think I can stuff an LS1 into it?
I agree, the front end isn't the greatest... I expected it to be a little bit lighter. |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th November 2024 - 03:16 AM |